Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:56:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:56:56 -0400 Received: from h24-67-14-151.cg.shawcable.net ([24.67.14.151]:64238 "EHLO webber.adilger.int") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:56:55 -0400 From: Andreas Dilger Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:55:08 -0600 To: Andrew Morton Cc: Robert Love , "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] CONFIG_NR_CPUS Message-ID: <20020606205508.GN27817@turbolinux.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , Robert Love , "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020606.031520.08940800.davem@redhat.com> <1023377213.13787.2.camel@sinai> <3CFFBCA9.843C40F0@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/0D35BED6 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7A37 5D79 BF1B CECA D44F 8A29 A488 39F5 0D35 BED6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Jun 06, 2002 12:48 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > But the arch maintainers should test one case please - x86 > was locking up at boot on quad CPU with NR_CPUS=2. Others may do > the same. Just a guess, but this could be because the two CPUs chosen for the boot sequence are not physically numbered 0 and 1, so they are overwriting the bounds of the per-CPU arrays. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/