Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S317175AbSFFU6L>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:58:11 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S317165AbSFFU6K>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:58:10 -0400
Received: from cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.152.185]:58544
	"EHLO opus.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S317175AbSFFU5c>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:57:32 -0400
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:56:43 -0700
From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Kai Henningsen <kaih@khms.westfalen.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: If you want kbuild 2.5, tell Linus
Message-ID: <20020606205643.GG14252@opus.bloom.county>
In-Reply-To: <E17Esc6-0000v9-00@starship> <8QMRXthXw-B@khms.westfalen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:31:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:

> Frankly, I see *absolutely no way* how the current Kai-Linus "merge" can  
> possibly end with something even remotely like Keith's kbuild2.5. Unless  
> Linus changes his approach radically.
> 
> If I were Keith, I'd be rather upset, too.

And beating ones head against the Linus-wall tends to end up with you
having a sore head in the end.

Either Kai will fix everything and not use kbuild-2.5 from keith (which
would be a shame) or eventually decide to use Keiths work.  And little
to nothing apart from time will give us one of the two solutions.

And FWIW, I like kbuild-2.5.

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/