Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753271Ab0KDIml (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 04:42:41 -0400 Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:52433 "EHLO mx3-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751758Ab0KDImi (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 04:42:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 04:41:12 -0400 (EDT) From: CAI Qian To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Adam Litke , Avi Kivity , Hugh Dickins , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Dave Hansen , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , Mike Travis , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Christoph Lameter , Chris Wright , bpicco@redhat.com, KOSAKI Motohiro , Balbir Singh , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Peter Zijlstra , Johannes Weiner , Daisuke Nishimura , Chris Mason , Borislav Petkov , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <2080208615.1392881288860072684.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <690735095.1385111288840247360.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 66] Transparent Hugepage Support #32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.5.5.72] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.21_GA_3150.RHEL4_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/5.0.21_GA_3150.RHEL4_64) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1939 Lines: 79 Thank Andrea for pointing out to me there are ongoing works for KSM and THP integration. Sorry for the noise. CAI Qian ----- caiqian@redhat.com wrote: > There were some changes of behaviours with THP and KSM statistics > demonstrated by this program, http://people.redhat.com/qcai/ksm01.c. > > There are 3 programs (A, B ,C) to allocate 128M memory each using KSM. > A has memory content = 'c'. > B has memory content = 'a'. > C has memory content = 'a'. > Then without THP, > pages_shared = 2 > pages_sharing = 98285 > pages_sharing = 98292 > pages_unshared = 0 > pages_volatile = 17 > pages_to_scan = 98304 > sleep_millisecs = 0 > with THP, > pages_shared is 2. > pages_sharing is 18422. > pages_unshared is 0. > pages_volatile is 8. > > Later, > A has memory content = 'c' > B has memory content = 'b' > C has memory content = 'a'. > Then without THP, > pages_shared = 3 > pages_sharing = 98296 > pages_unshared = 0 > pages_volatile = 5 > with THP, > pages_shared = 3 > pages_sharing = 16358 > pages_unshared = 0 > pages_volatile = 23 > > Later, > A has memory content = 'd' > B has memory content = 'd' > C has memory content = 'd' > Then without THP, > pages_shared = 1 > pages_sharing = 98274 > pages_unshared = 0 > pages_volatile = 29 > with THP, > pages_shared = 1 > pages_sharing = 8668 > pages_unshared = 0 > pages_volatile = 35 > > Finally, > A changes one page to 'e' > Then without THP, > pages_shared = 1 > pages_sharing = 98274 > pages_unshared = 1 > pages_volatile = 28 > with THP, > pages_shared = 1 > pages_sharing = 8163 > pages_unshared = 1 > pages_volatile = 27 > > Are those differences for pages_sharing between with and without THP > are expected? > > CAI Qian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/