Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752111Ab0KDOlU (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:41:20 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42055 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751993Ab0KDOlQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:41:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:06:58 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Tejun Heo Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, petero2@telia.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, jack@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, tytso@mit.edu, mfasheh@suse.com, joel.becker@oracle.com, aelder@sgi.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, neilb@suse.de, leochen@broadcom.com, sbranden@broadcom.com, chris.mason@oracle.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, joern@logfs.org, konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] block: make blkdev_get/put() handle exclusive access Message-ID: <20101103150658.GA5627@quack.suse.cz> References: <1288628129-12811-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1288628129-12811-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1288628129-12811-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1485 Lines: 37 On Mon 01-11-10 17:15:28, Tejun Heo wrote: > Over time, block layer has accumulated a set of APIs dealing with bdev > open, close, claim and release. > > * blkdev_get/put() are the primary open and close functions. > > * bd_claim/release() deal with exclusive open. > > * open/close_bdev_exclusive() are combination of open and claim and > the other way around, respectively. > > * bd_link/unlink_disk_holder() to create and remove holder/slave > symlinks. > > * open_by_devnum() wraps bdget() + blkdev_get(). > > The interface is a bit confusing and the decoupling of open and claim > makes it impossible to properly guarantee exclusive access as > in-kernel open + claim sequence can disturb the existing exclusive > open even before the block layer knows the current open if for another > exclusive access. Reorganize the interface such that, ... The patch looks OK to me as far as ext3, ext4, and reiserfs are concerned. One thing I wondered about when I looked at it - does someone use the 'mode' argument of the blkdev_put() function (well, apart from the exclusive flag)? Because I've looked at a few random disk ->release() functions and none of them used it... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/