Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 20:31:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 20:31:33 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-086.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.86]:2770 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 20:31:32 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: If you want kbuild 2.5, tell Linus Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 02:30:33 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] In-Reply-To: <8QMRXthXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 06 June 2002 21:31, Kai Henningsen wrote: > phillips@bonn-fries.net (Daniel Phillips) wrote on 03.06.02 in : > > > Linus has already indicated his position, I guess you were busy writing > > the post so you didn't notice: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102304528224527&w=2 > > > > Plus you've got helpers, how could the situation be better? > > I fail to see how this is supposed to work, and I guess so does Keith. > > Kai (a different Kai!) does not seem to want to integrate the core part of > kbuild2.5. He seems to want to only pick the low-hanging fruits and make > unsupported (and unbelievable) noises about the rest. There's certainly been time enough for action, and I don't see any. I'd say Kai (the other Kai) is stalling and not being cooperative at all. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/