Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 04:18:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 04:18:33 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:53764 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 04:18:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 09:18:26 +0100 From: Russell King To: "Holzrichter, Bruce" Cc: "'davem@redhat.com'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sparc64 pgalloc.h pgd_quicklist question Message-ID: <20020607091826.A5413@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <61DB42B180EAB34E9D28346C11535A783A78A3@nocmail101.ma.tmpw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:10:40PM -0500, Holzrichter, Bruce wrote: > I meant to ask this a little bit back, while I was looking through this > code. In the 2.5 iteration you have for small_page.c your using the > next_hash and pprev_hash entries, which no longer are available in the > struct page, as far as I have looked, unless your struct page is defined > elsewhere, other than linux/mm.h? Just wondering, as I pull apart the mm > code in what time I have looking at this. It looks like next_hash and pprev_hash migrated to list. (I've not confirmed that it obeys exactly the same rules yet.) The solution is probably to convert small-page.c to use the list stuff instead. If you don't get there before me, I'll probably fix it up this weekend. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/