Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754706Ab0KHOFy (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:05:54 -0500 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:36720 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754231Ab0KHOFw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:05:52 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oUESSuT1xOZt7yYm3n27hWzsuR9vrHi8cFIzPJd5nDxTHo8zneXRkLCJgePuWcWU/Y fKDShjzv1dsWhK/j4U7cGrnPDP/dSHag2dHcw74/SxVc1qDCDcIMESYmRUpSgyR8XZwD itIrMK/sH8TtJ/O7BHT2MbdglrVHJKhnb2TFk= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4C0670E2.1090708@netservers.co.uk> References: <2d460de71003260850x7f90d04cy79ac853464108182@mail.gmail.com> <20100326160226.0159ac3b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4BACE827.4070006@gmail.com> <20100326170428.6c1ad66c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4BB31E00.8060204@netservers.co.uk> <20100529021624.GA2538@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com> <4C03E1CD.4000809@netservers.co.uk> <4C0670E2.1090708@netservers.co.uk> From: Richard Hartmann Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:05:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch] fix packet loss and massive ping spikes with PPP multi-link To: Ben McKeegan Cc: Paul Mackerras , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , "Alexander E. Patrakov" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gabriele.paoloni@intel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 948 Lines: 22 On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 16:55, Ben McKeegan wrote: > Still working on this, updating the patch wasn't as trivial as I thought as > it clashed with Gabriele Paoloni's ppp_mp_explode redesign.  However, while > looking at this code I believe I have found a bug which might have been > contributing to the poor performance the OP was experiencing.   For the case > where channel speeds are unknown and there are more than 2 channels it would > miscalculate the fragment sizes so they are not balanced on the channels. > > Patch for the bug to follow immediately. Is there any update on this? It's been quite some time since you last updated on this issue. Thanks a lot, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/