Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751954Ab0KID2O (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:28:14 -0500 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:53434 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751265Ab0KID2N (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:28:13 -0500 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 2/4] Revert "oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable" Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , LKML , linux-mm In-Reply-To: <20101109105801.BC30.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20101109105801.BC30.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <20101109122817.BC5A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:28:10 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 906 Lines: 23 > > Yes, I've tested it, and it deprecates the tunable as expected. A single > > warning message serves the purpose well: let users know one time without > > being overly verbose that the tunable is deprecated and give them > > sufficient time (2 years) to start using the new tunable. That's how > > deprecation is done. > > no sense. > > Why do their application need to rewrite for *YOU*? Okey, you will got > benefit from your new knob. But NOBDOY use the new one. and People need > to rewrite their application even though no benefit. > > Don't do selfish userland breakage! And you said you ignore bug even though you have seen it. It suck! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/