Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:12:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:12:02 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:56564 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 17:12:01 -0400 Message-ID: <3D012188.7B6ADC9F@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 14:11:36 -0700 From: george anzinger Organization: Monta Vista Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20b i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ashieh@OCF.Berkeley.EDU CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gettimeofday clock jump bug In-Reply-To: <200206072021.g57KLJU04835@war.OCF.Berkeley.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ashieh@OCF.Berkeley.EDU wrote: > > Hi, > > time() occasionally returns a bogus value (>1 hour jump forward, and a few microseconds later jumps back to the right time) on my box (Thunderbird 750, Asus K7V (KX133) kernel 2.4.17). This behavior sets in after the box is up for some period of time. I don't think this is related to the 686a configuration reset bug. I suspect that do_gettimeoffset() may be, on occasion, returning a negative number. The normalizing code then works with this (unsigned) value until it is < 1,000,000. If it came back as -1, this would generate an error of about 1.19 hours. I suspect the best fix would be to test the result from do_gettimeoffset() for something greater than say 20ms and if so set it to 0. -g > > I suspect that somehow the either do_gettimeoffset() or xtime.tv_usec in do_gettimeofday is returning a ridiculously large value. I would like to get to the bottom of this problem, but am not familiar with this part of the timing infrastructure. Has anyone seen this bug before? Would using a different locking mode (SMP vs none SMP, or wahtever) possibly help this problem? Is there a document online describing how this works in Linux? > > In the meantime, I want to hack up a patch to fix this on my box. I'm thinking I could give up a few seconds of clock precision in exchange for monotonic clock behavior, and so I want to comment out the adjustments to usec. What are the possible ramifications of this hack? > > Alan > > Original do_gettimeofday: > > void do_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv) > { > unsigned long flags; > unsigned long usec, sec; > > read_lock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags); > usec = do_gettimeoffset(); > { > unsigned long lost = jiffies - wall_jiffies; > if (lost) > usec += lost * (1000000 / HZ); > } > sec = xtime.tv_sec; > usec += xtime.tv_usec; > read_unlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags); > > while (usec >= 1000000) { > usec -= 1000000; > sec++; > } > > tv->tv_sec = sec; > tv->tv_usec = usec; > } > > My proposed hack (for my system): > > void do_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv) > { > unsigned long flags; > unsigned long usec, sec; > > read_lock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags); > usec = do_gettimeoffset(); > /* { > unsigned long lost = jiffies - wall_jiffies; > if (lost) > usec += lost * (1000000 / HZ); > } */ > sec = xtime.tv_sec; > usec = xtime.tv_usec; > read_unlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags); > > while (usec >= 1000000) { > usec -= 1000000; > sec++; > } > > tv->tv_sec = sec; > tv->tv_usec = usec; > } > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/