Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754208Ab0KIRYQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:24:16 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53856 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752658Ab0KIRYP (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:24:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:17:54 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Rik van Riel , Ying Han , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roland McGrath , "Eric W. Biederman" , JANAK DESAI Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1][2nd resend] sys_unshare: remove the dead CLONE_THREAD/SIGHAND/VM code Message-ID: <20101109171754.GB6971@redhat.com> References: <20101105174142.GA19469@redhat.com> <20101105174343.GB19469@redhat.com> <20101109201742.BCA1.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101109201742.BCA1.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1296 Lines: 36 On 11/09, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > -static void check_unshare_flags(unsigned long *flags_ptr) > > +static int check_unshare_flags(unsigned long unshare_flags) > > { > > + if (unshare_flags & ~(CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_FS|CLONE_NEWNS|CLONE_SIGHAND| > > + CLONE_VM|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SYSVSEM| > > + CLONE_NEWUTS|CLONE_NEWIPC|CLONE_NEWNET)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > Please put WARN_ON_ONCE() explicitly. That's good way to find hidden > user if exist and getting better bug report. Perhaps... but this needs a separate change. Please note that this check was simply moved from sys_unshare(), this patch shouldn't have any visible effect. Personally, I think it would be even better if, say, unshare(CLONE_THREAD) returned -EINVAL unconditionally. > And, I've reveied this patch and I've found no fault. but I will not put > my ack because I think I haven't understand original intention perhaps. Thanks! IIRC, the main (only?) motivation for sys_unshare() was unshare_fs(). Most probably unshare_thread/vm were added as placeholders. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/