Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754673Ab0KISc0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:32:26 -0500 Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:56326 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754329Ab0KIScW (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:32:22 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 67.188.36.105 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/hIrHQ1Lyx4q/o+HzQr6iJ Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:32:09 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: "Guzman Lugo, Fernando" Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Felipe Contreras , Greg KH , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Omar Ramirez Luna Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] fixes for tidspbridge 2.6.37-rc1 Message-ID: <20101109183208.GG9264@atomide.com> References: <201011091729.17679.arnd@arndb.de> <20101109173536.GE9264@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1638 Lines: 46 * Guzman Lugo, Fernando [101109 09:43]: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Guzman Lugo, Fernando [101109 08:36]: > >> > >> tidspbridge iommu change are working fine all the patches and few fixes after > >> that are alredy sent. what breaks tidspbridge, is the unmerged > >> dependencies in linux omap tree, specifically the iommu module patches > >> and the SG patch. > > > > Care to post a series of the missing patches listed above? > > Here are the missing patches: > > Fernando Guzman Lugo (4): > iovmm: no gap checking for fixed address > iovmm: add superpages support to fixed da address > iovmm: replace __iounmap with omap_iounmap > iommu: create new api to set valid da range Yeah this is stuff for Hiroshi to look at and queue for 2.6.28. No way we can merge these now. > and > scatterlist: define SG chain for arm architecture And this we need to test carefully it's not something we can just merge. Has this been tested to work with omap MMC drivers? I'm not at all convinced the drivers can deal with chained SG lists.. This may not show up with light testing, the SG lists can be very small in most cases. So this would have to be tested to make sure the the chained SG list handled properly. The same goes for other omap drivers that may be using SG. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/