Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754962Ab0KJI0O (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 03:26:14 -0500 Received: from bld-mail16.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.101]:38603 "EHLO mail.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753226Ab0KJI0M (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 03:26:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:24:58 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Evgeniy Ivanov Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jens Axboe , dave b , Sanjoy Mahajan , Jesper Juhl , Chris Mason , Ingo Molnar , Pekka Enberg , Aidar Kultayev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Nick Piggin , Arjan van de Ven , Thomas Gleixner , "Ted Ts'o" , Corrado Zoccolo , Shaohua Li , Steven Barrett Subject: Re: 2.6.36 io bring the system to its knees Message-ID: <20101110082458.GU2715@dastard> References: <20101105014334.GF13830@dastard> <4CD696B4.6070002@kernel.dk> <20101110013255.GR2715@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1549 Lines: 38 On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:08:17AM +0300, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Don't forget to mention data=writeback is not the default because if > > your system crashes or you lose power running in this mode it will > > *CORRUPT YOUR FILESYSTEM* and you *WILL LOSE DATA*. Not to mention > > the significant security issues (e.g stale data exposure) that also > > occur even if the filesystem is not corrupted by the crash. IOWs, > > data=writeback is the "fast but I'll eat your data" option for ext3. > > > > So I recommend that nobody follows this path because it only leads > > to worse trouble down the road. ?Your best bet it to migrate away > > from ext3 to a filesystem that doesn't have such inherent ordering > > problems like ext4 or XFS.... > > Is it save to use "data=writeback" with ext4? I believe the same issues exist with data=writeback in ext4, but you probably should have an ext4 developer answer that question for certain. > At least are there security issues? > Why do you say, that fs can be corrupted? Metadata is still > journalled, so only data might be corrupted, but FS should still be > consistent. Data corruption is still a filesystem corruption. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/