Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755613Ab0KJSkI (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:40:08 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:46737 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753516Ab0KJSkH (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:40:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:39:40 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Rakib Mullick Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs, sysfs: Change sysfs_pathname function prototype. Message-ID: <20101110183940.GA15089@kroah.com> References: <20101109224450.GB21992@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 741 Lines: 20 On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:53:37AM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > > > If it's really not used then why would marking it inline help out any? > > Shouldn't we just delete the function instead? > > > As far as I can see, its been called recursively and also from > sysfs_add_one. Am I missing anything? If so, then what is the compiler warning that is being generated that you are trying to resolve? totally confused, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/