Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756560Ab0KJUV0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:21:26 -0500 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:45196 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756254Ab0KJUVY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:21:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20101110201600.GA14145@pengutronix.de> References: <1288897200-13008-1-git-send-email-dvhart@linux.intel.com> <20101110201600.GA14145@pengutronix.de> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:21:21 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3Xoz9GjcD6n-akSEAHAKwXi8LGQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [tip:core/urgent] futex: Address compiler warnings in exit_robust_list From: Darren Hart To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=F6nig?= Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, jkacur@redhat.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, matt@console-pimps.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2070 Lines: 50 2010/11/10 Uwe Kleine-K?nig : > Hallo Thomas, > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:30:44PM +0000, tip-bot for Darren Hart wrote: >> Commit-ID: ?4c115e951d80aff126468adaec7a6c7854f61ab8 >> Gitweb: ? ? http://git.kernel.org/tip/4c115e951d80aff126468adaec7a6c7854f61ab8 >> Author: ? ? Darren Hart >> AuthorDate: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:00:00 -0400 >> Committer: ?Thomas Gleixner >> CommitDate: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:27:50 +0100 >> >> futex: Address compiler warnings in exit_robust_list >> >> Since commit 1dcc41bb (futex: Change 3rd arg of fetch_robust_entry() >> to unsigned int*) some gcc versions decided to emit the following >> warning: >> >> kernel/futex.c: In function ?exit_robust_list?: >> kernel/futex.c:2492: warning: ?next_pi? may be used uninitialized in this function >> >> The commit did not introduce the warning as gcc should have warned >> before that commit as well. It's just gcc being silly. >> >> The code path really can't result in next_pi being unitialized (or >> should not), but let's keep the build clean. Annotate next_pi as an >> uninitialized_var. >> >> [ tglx: Addressed the same issue in futex_compat.c and massaged the >> ? ? ? changelog ] >> >> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart >> Tested-by: Matt Fleming >> Tested-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig > I don't care much (at least until someone claims this change to > introduce a regression), but I didn't test it. ?I only suggested to use > uninitialized_var instead of = 0. > Uwe, I added you after you said I could add the ARM platform and compiler to the list. I took that to mean you had confirmed that the patch fixed the warning on that platform. I apologize as this is apparently not the case. -- Darren -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/