Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:52:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:51:55 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:39887 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:51:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:21:16 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Dietmar Kling cc: Martin Dalecki , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit In-Reply-To: <3A352443.E3FEE114@sam-net.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Dietmar Kling wrote: > > You do realize what "evolution" means? I'm not talking about the bugs > > in implementation. I'm talking about botched design. _That_ never gets > > fixed. Show me one example when that would happen and I might consider > > taking such possibility seriously. > > That's what I am talking about in my "mean" attitude. Some things > must be carried until the dead end. When there's no place to move > anymore than new things will evolve. Minix is still alive. > < short thinking > > As for your second point. Take libc5 and libc6. I really have no > *deep* insight. But I believe redesigning it for Multithreading > was mayor step. ... and libc6 was not a result of evolution of libc5 - they have a common ancestor, but they got several years of divergent evolution before the displacement had happened. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/