Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755017Ab0KLDRO (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:17:14 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70]:35169 "EHLO sj-iport-1.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752492Ab0KLDRN (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:17:13 -0500 Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAPJA3EyrR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACiTHGkOJsehUoEhFqFfg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,186,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="380135503" From: Roland Dreier To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Greg KH , Arnaud Lacombe , Anca Emanuel , Elvis Dowson , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Forked android kernel development from linux kernel mainline References: <01784A8B-36A0-4E8A-9729-23C2B19351F8@mac.com> <20101111004730.GC22463@kroah.com> <201011111221.09237.florian@openwrt.org> X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:17:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: <201011111221.09237.florian@openwrt.org> (Florian Fainelli's message of "Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:21:08 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 563 Lines: 13 > Why can't we merge that core infrastructure as well? Has it been > rejected for any specific reasons? There's nothing obviously wrong with it, and I didn't mean to suggest that there would be a problem merging it. I was just pointing out that openwrt has done a bit more than just drivers and arch code. - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/