Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757596Ab0KLNa3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:30:29 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:35073 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752711Ab0KLNa2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:30:28 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=HE1nUB+wakKHp3rmb7eOjlhqccyOJUy/gZaPSuFnnUxqWLAvShLfzrYM6iryfqcjrK 2GnIl953YWkRRiF6wQlX8yQ8VwHN7yesggITXM4a01ILrM8+/Dt4JtZThh3yEoCam4s/ V22I7j8goeP3vvkUFXa3V50tt5M7DCosNBUZE= Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:30:22 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Stephane Eranian Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Andi Kleen , Corey Ashford , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com, paulus Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Add support for extra parameters for raw events Message-ID: <20101112133019.GA5595@nowhere> References: <4CDC3845.4030104@linux.intel.com> <4CDC4628.8020109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101111194936.GJ18718@basil.fritz.box> <1289505587.2084.193.camel@laptop> <20101111201259.GL18718@basil.fritz.box> <1289507858.2084.195.camel@laptop> <20101112102748.GA8020@basil.fritz.box> <1289561817.2084.240.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1180 Lines: 25 On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:00:43PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 11:49 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote: > >> The difficulty with PEBS-LL (load latency) is not so much the encoding of the > >> latency. It is more how to expose the data back to user. You get a full PEBS > >> record for each miss. So you get the PEBS machine state + data addr, miss > >> latency, and data source (where did the line come from). We have already > >> discussed how to expose machine state in general. I'll work on a patch for this. > > > > Frederic was working on this PERF_SAMPLE_REGS stuff as well for his copy > > the stack top and let dwarfs go wild at it patches. > > > Ok, I'll talk to him again about this then. Would you like me to respin this isolated chunk of my dwarf cfi unwinding patchset? So that we can discuss the ABI. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/