Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 16:32:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 16:32:06 -0400 Received: from [213.4.129.129] ([213.4.129.129]:19771 "EHLO tsmtp8.mail.isp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 16:32:06 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 22:05:37 +0200 From: Diego Calleja To: Nicholas Miell Cc: phillips@bonn-fries.net, adelton@informatics.muni.cz, christoph@lameter.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adelton@fi.muni.cz Subject: Re: vfat patch for shortcut display as symlinks for 2.4.18 Message-Id: <20020609220537.6cd71662.diegocg@teleline.es> In-Reply-To: <1023648813.1188.19.camel@entropy> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09 Jun 2002 11:53:32 -0700 Nicholas Miell escribi?: > First of all, some programs (WINE) will actually want to use the .lnk > files, and transparently converting them to symlinks will complicate > that. I agree. M$ did .lnk _files_, but really, there's not symlinks in vfat world. Even msdos doesn't recognize them. I don't remember if it's the same in NTFS, W2000 & XP are so good that I can't work with them in 32MB RAM... And I must say that symlinks are not needed in most of the windows 9X systems. They aren't really useful for most of the systems. But if someone needs it, it'd be include as a .config option..... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/