Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 17:30:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 17:30:51 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com ([204.127.198.38]:9646 "EHLO rwcrmhc51.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 17:30:50 -0400 Subject: Re: vfat patch for shortcut display as symlinks for 2.4.18 From: Nicholas Miell To: Thunder from the hill Cc: Diego Calleja , phillips@bonn-fries.net, adelton@informatics.muni.cz, christoph@lameter.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adelton@fi.muni.cz In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 09 Jun 2002 14:30:45 -0700 Message-Id: <1023658246.1659.4.camel@entropy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 13:40, Thunder from the hill wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Diego Calleja wrote: > > I agree. M$ did .lnk _files_, but really, there's not symlinks in vfat > > world. Even msdos doesn't recognize them. I don't remember if it's the > > same in NTFS, W2000 & XP are so good that I can't work with them in 32MB > > RAM... > > Some time ago I found a document proposing a different API for Windows > 2002 which was supposed to include symlinks into ntfs, so I don't think > it was there. > NTFS is a real filesystem, unlike VFAT. It has native support for hard links, and, IIRC, the version that ships with Windows XP can do something similar to symbolic links. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/