Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:10:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:09:54 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:1028 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:09:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20001211000439.B2583@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:04:39 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Fr?d?ric L . W . Meunier <0@pervalidus.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SysRq behavior In-Reply-To: <20001209042444.F7282@pervalidus.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <20001209042444.F7282@pervalidus.dyndns.org> ; from Fr?d?ric L . W . Meunier on Sat, Dec 0 9, 2000 at 04:24:44AM -0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > I don't remember having the same problem months (6?) ago when > I built my first Kernel with this enabled (well, maybe I never > touched the key). > > When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the > PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested > on a console and GNU screen). Is this just me or I should > expect it? Probably bug. Happens for me, too, and it is pretty nasty. Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/