Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754845Ab0KOJaq (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:30:46 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4271 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752492Ab0KOJap (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:30:45 -0500 Message-ID: <4CE0FDBC.20505@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:30:36 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.1.6-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xiao Guangrong CC: Marcelo Tosatti , Gleb Natapov , LKML , KVM Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: MMU: retry #PF for softmmu References: <4CDCE2B0.7000601@cn.fujitsu.com> <4CDCE3C2.9030107@cn.fujitsu.com> <4CDFBE00.2000802@redhat.com> <4CE0C45C.809@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <4CE0C45C.809@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2058 Lines: 56 On 11/15/2010 07:25 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > On 11/14/2010 06:46 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 11/12/2010 08:50 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > >> Retry #PF for softmmu only when the current vcpu has the same > >> root shadow page as the time when #PF occurs. it means they > >> have same paging environment > >> > > > > Hi Avi, > > Thanks for your review. > > > The process could have been killed and replaced by another using the > > same cr3. > > Yeah, this 'retry' is unnecessary if the process is killed, but this > case is infrequent, the most case is the process keeps running and try > to access the fault address later. The problem is that if we retry in this case, we install an incorrect spte? > And, we can get few advantages even if the process have been killed, > since we can fix the page mapping for the other processes which have > the same CR3, if other process accessed the fault address, the #PF > can be avoid. (of course we can't speculate other process can access > the fault address later) > > After all, this is a speculate path, i thinks it can work well in most > case. :-) > > > Or we may be running a guest that uses the same cr3 for all > > processes. > > We can allow to retry #PF in the same CR3 even if there are the different > processes, since these processes have the same page mapping, the later #PF > can avoid if the page mapping have been fixed. The guest may have changed page directories or other levels. > > Or another thread may have mmap()ed something else over the > > same address. > > The mmap virtual address is also visible for other threads since the threads > have the same page table, so i think this case is the same as above? Again, don't we install the wrong spte in this case? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/