Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 00:51:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 00:51:05 -0400 Received: from csl.Stanford.EDU ([171.64.66.149]:25492 "EHLO csl.Stanford.EDU") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 00:51:03 -0400 From: Dawson Engler Message-Id: <200206100451.VAA17135@csl.Stanford.EDU> Subject: Re: [CHECKER] 18 potential missing unlocks in 2.4.17 To: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller) Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 21:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mc@cs.Stanford.EDU In-Reply-To: <20020609.213904.09568104.davem@redhat.com> from "David S. Miller" at Jun 09, 2002 09:39:04 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > 2.4.17 is _REALLY_ old, any chance you can rerun these things > on 2.4.19-pre10 by chance? Any bets on how many bugs are still live? ;-) > You should really investigate toning down the amount of hand frobbing > you have to do to the kernel tree to get your experimental g++ to eat > it. We use gcc now, so the amount of frobbing is limited to getting as many configure options set as possible. I'll do an update. Dawson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/