Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933410Ab0KORny (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:43:54 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:53906 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933281Ab0KORnw (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:43:52 -0500 Message-ID: <4CE17133.2050101@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:43:15 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Andres Salomon , Milton Miller , Grant Likely , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: OLPC: speed up device tree creation during boot (v2) References: <20101111214546.4e573cad@queued.net> <20101112002704.50c629e2@queued.net> <20101114095013.GB24206@elte.hu> <4CE0B54E.6000101@zytor.com> <20101115070254.GA25243@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20101115070254.GA25243@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1422 Lines: 35 On 11/14/2010 11:02 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> What? What is wrong with static variables in functions? It really doesn't seem >> to be a good idea to make them file-scope if they don't need to be. > > They are very easy to overlook and mix up with regular stack variables and i've seen > (and introduced myself) a number of bugs due to them. > > They also often are used in buggy ways (with SMP not taken into consideration), so > overlooking them during review compounds their negative effects. Putting them in > front of the function isnt a big deal in exchange. > > There are people who never overlook them (like yourself), but my brain is wired up > differently. > However, I have to vehemently object to putting them in a wider scope than is otherwise necessary. I agree that static variables should be used sparsely if at all (there really are vary few uses of them that are valid), but putting them in a larger scope screams "I'm used in more than one function", and that is *not* a good thing. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/