Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933269Ab0KORuT (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:50:19 -0500 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:44796 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756163Ab0KORuR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:50:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 4/7] taskstats: Add per task steal time accounting From: Peter Zijlstra To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Michael Holzheu , Shailabh Nagar , Andrew Morton , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Suresh Siddha , Ingo Molnar , Oleg Nesterov , John stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Balbir Singh , Heiko Carstens , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "jeremy.fitzhardinge" In-Reply-To: <20101115184206.4463fd05@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20101111170352.732381138@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101111170815.024542355@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1289677083.2109.167.camel@laptop> <20101115155057.15f3be35@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <1289833883.2109.494.camel@laptop> <20101115184206.4463fd05@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:48:32 +0100 Message-ID: <1289843312.2109.518.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 568 Lines: 12 On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 18:42 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > Would you prefer another #ifdef orgy to > avoid the overhead for VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=n? We can certainly do > that. > That still doesn't answer the question, why do you want this? What is per task steal time accounting good for? What problem is being solved? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/