Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/7] taskstats: Improve cumulative CPU time
 accounting
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Shailabh Nagar <nagar1234@in.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
        Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        John stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20101115184910.549a828b@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
References: <20101111170352.732381138@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	 <20101111170815.404670062@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	 <20101113183810.GA9021@redhat.com>
	 <20101115165521.21baac60@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
	 <1289837036.2109.501.camel@laptop>
	 <20101115184910.549a828b@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:51:57 +0100
Message-ID: <1289843517.2109.521.camel@laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 691
Lines: 15

On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 18:49 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > To what purpose? 
>  
> Is that a trick question? Why do we have tools like "top"? Or process
> accounting? The point is that the quality of the numbers we get right
> now is rather bad, the overhead of scanning /proc is horrendous and
> the 10ms granularity is rather coarse. 

But you're not just replacing top, you're adding all kinds of new
accounting crap all over the place.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/