Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758062Ab0KORxp (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:53:45 -0500 Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:64945 "EHLO mail-gw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756323Ab0KORxn (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:53:43 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=CBistYsLCQIlqVoeOkIxh7jYasQDGDI5Y/gHg7QDlZvGG/WPS/n/0We0pyimZ7NS6S HeVwi/dX2w7UMrCZ6Q72MaW2J8p7QZ6y7do3l/9fgh8vuLBilPlVuu5BZR3TB+3ppiCq WM9XsbGGVUJXY5Fk5Rcl5+Ct9p+3F2heYk7Hk= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20101115065919.GB14442@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <4CD8566D.1020202@vlnb.net> <20101109002829.GA22633@kroah.com> <4CD9A9B8.70708@vlnb.net> <4CDA6CD4.3010308@panasas.com> <4CDAFE6E.7050200@vlnb.net> <4CDBBE80.40908@panasas.com> <4CDC56F9.9040601@vlnb.net> <20101112012315.GE17097@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4CDEC8D2.8080101@vlnb.net> <20101113235938.GA1827@kroah.com> <20101115065919.GB14442@core.coreip.homeip.net> From: Bart Van Assche Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:53:20 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: V9CPkqsF8yR_jaoJyfO_k0kw8dg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/19]: SCST SYSFS interface implementation To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Greg KH , Vladislav Bolkhovitin , Boaz Harrosh , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scst-devel , James Bottomley , Andrew Morton , FUJITA Tomonori , Mike Christie , Vu Pham , James Smart , Joe Eykholt , Andy Yan , Chetan Loke , Hannes Reinecke , Richard Sharpe , Daniel Henrique Debonzi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 783 Lines: 20 On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > [ ... ] > This is quite unfortunate as I still have not seen the public comparison > of the 2 implementations and the lists of benefits and shortfalls for > both of them. The reason why we are proposing SCST for upstream inclusion are: - It has a large user base. - The project is known for its high performance, low latency I/O and excellent stability. - A feature-wise overview can be found here: http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/