Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758383Ab0KOUzq (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:55:46 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.44.51]:52133 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758372Ab0KOUzp (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:55:45 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=ndW59qojIi8WwZNJxYN93ID0nbWhIcd416+Cqc19dXIgfdovUZ/XWoeGuBES30ngY9 V64tfH/0iBRalCbeS82Q== Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:54:56 -0800 (PST) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Alan Cox cc: "Figo.zhang" , KOSAKI Motohiro , "Figo.zhang" , lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert oom rewrite series In-Reply-To: <20101115105735.0f9c1a22@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <1289402093.10699.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1289402666.10699.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20101114141913.E019.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <4CE0A87E.1030304@leadcoretech.com> <20101115105735.0f9c1a22@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2217 Lines: 45 On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Alan Cox wrote: > > The goal was to make the oom killer heuristic as predictable as possible > > and to kill the most memory-hogging task to avoid having to recall it and > > needlessly kill several tasks. > > Meta question - why is that a good thing. In a desktop environment it's > frequently wrong, in a server environment it is often wrong. We had this > before where people spend months fiddling with the vm and make it work > slightly differently and it suits their workload, then other workloads go > downhill. Then the cycle repeats. > Most of the arbitrary heuristics were removed from oom_badness(), things like nice level, runtime, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE, etc., so that we only consider the rss and swap usage of each application in comparison to each other when deciding which task to kill. We give root tasks a 3% bonus since they tend to be more important to the productivity or uptime of the machine, which did exist -- albeit with a more dramatic impact -- in the old heursitic. You'll find that the new heuristic always kills the task consuming the most amount of rss unless influenced by userspace via the tunables (or within 3% of root tasks). We always want to kill the most memory-hogging task because it avoids needlessly killing additional tasks when we must immediately recall the oom killer because we continue to allocate memory. If that task happens to be of vital importance to userspace, then the user has full control over tuning the oom killer priorities in such circumstances. > > You have full control over disabling a task from being considered with > > oom_score_adj just like you did with oom_adj. Since oom_adj is > > deprecated for two years, you can even use the old interface until then. > > Which changeset added it to the Documentation directory as deprecated ? > 51b1bd2a was the actual change that deprecated it, which was a direct follow-up to a63d83f4 which actually obsoleted it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/