Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933930Ab0KPIAD (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 03:00:03 -0500 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:56567 "EHLO e39.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757118Ab0KPIAB (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 03:00:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:59:59 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Dave Airlie Cc: Martin Wilck , linux-kernel , Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: Incorrect size checks on mmap() for sysfs PCI resource files is breaking X? Message-ID: <20101116075959.GS14383@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> Reply-To: djwong@us.ibm.com References: <20101116072247.GQ14383@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 870 Lines: 22 On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:53:35PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just loaded 2.6.37-rc2 on my machines, and I noticed that X no longer starts. > > Running an strace of the X server shows that it's doing this: > > Can you poinpoint when it went wrong? does 2.6.36 work okay? Yes, 2.6.36 is ok. 2.6.37-rc1 was ok too. > Just trying to figure out where the regression arrived. Looks like it's commit 3b519e4ea618b6943a82931630872907f9ac2c2b which went in 11 Nov 2010. I just submitted a patch that fixes it, at least for me. --D -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/