Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:43:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:42:58 -0500 Received: from vega.digitel2002.hu ([213.163.0.181]:30480 "EHLO vega.digitel2002.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:42:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 23:12:21 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12 Message-ID: <20001211231221.C30911@vega.digitel2002.hu> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 04:38:11PM -0200 X-Operating-System: vega Linux 2.2.18pre24 i686 From: Gabor Lenart Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 04:38:11PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 11 Dec 2000, John Fremlin wrote: > > > Two points: [snipped] > > > Doing a 'make bzImage' is NOT VM-intensive. Using this as a test > for the VM doesn't make any sense since it doesn't really excercise > the VM in any way... Also, you should view the result of some hdd benchmarks because it's possible to get different values for 2.4 and 2.2 which is major point for a fair test (maybe 2.4 and 2.2 have got different default values and so on. try hdparm -tT /dev/hd? if you have got IDE disks). -- ---[ G?bor L?n?rt ]----[ Vivendi Telecom Hungary ]---[ lgb@supervisor.hu ]--- U have 8 bit computer or chip of them and it's unused or to be sold? Call me! -------[ +36 30 2270823 ]--------> LGB <-------[ Linux/UNIX/8bit 4ever ]----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/