Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932546Ab0KPVa7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:30:59 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:58972 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759152Ab0KPVa5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:30:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1289929012.11405.12.camel@mulgrave.site> References: <1289606118.3015.539.camel@mulgrave.site> <20101113051635.GA11613@havoc.gtf.org> <20101116071029.GA13540@havoc.gtf.org> <1289929012.11405.12.camel@mulgrave.site> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:30:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] SCSI host lock push-down To: James Bottomley Cc: Jeff Garzik , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , Andrew Morton , linux-scsi , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 782 Lines: 19 On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:36 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > > I was thinking through next for a few days to see if anything breaks in > the architectures with scsi drivers we can't compile on x86 ... but > realistically that will happen in -rcX as well, so I'm happy either way. I really just wanted a firm "just take the patch" or "wait for a pull", so that I can forget about this issue either way. But it sounds like I have an ack for you, so I might as well just take the patch. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/