Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:04:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:04:16 -0500 Received: from catbert.rellim.com ([204.17.205.1]:17425 "EHLO catbert.rellim.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:04:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:33:42 -0800 (PST) From: "Gary E. Miller" To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: SMBFS does not compile on test12-pre8 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yo All! I just tried to compile SMBFS in test12-pre8. Here is the error message I get: make[3]: Entering directory `/u3/local/src/linux-2.4.0-test12-pre8/fs/smbfs' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/local/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -DSMBFS_PARANOIA -c -o sock.o sock.c sock.c: In function `smb_data_ready': sock.c:166: structure has no member named `next' make[3]: *** [sock.o] Error 1 This has worked in the recent past. This is the failing line 166 in fs/smbfs/sock.c: job->cb.next = NULL; It looks like tq_struct has been changed so that the tq_struct->next member is now tq_struct->list.next. So can we just delete line 166 in fs/smbfs/sock.c? Or do we still need to initialize next by changing line 166 to: job->cb.list.next = NULL. Ideas? RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701 gem@rellim.com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/