Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 19:26:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 19:26:17 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:33733 "HELO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 19:26:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 01:24:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: mingo@elte.hu To: Mike Kravetz Cc: Robert Love , Subject: Re: Scheduler Bug (set_cpus_allowed) In-Reply-To: <20020610161559.H1565@w-mikek2.des.beaverton.ibm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Mike Kravetz wrote: > You might also consider adding the optimization/fast path to > set_cpus_allowed(). Once again, I don't expect this routine (or this > code path) to be used much, but I just hate to see us scheudle a > migration task to set the cpu field when it is safe to do it within the > routine. sure, agreed. I've added it to my tree. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/