Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751878Ab0KSEuE (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:50:04 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:37854 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751274Ab0KSEuB (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:50:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=DicMfWJ45D8ydhsIaXOUmYD2fEbV4BoFQCsvHHiJ1zJgoCslaQk2tOx+HWvCVnXDwA WFtmAmmyqib9xTbyXLFmHMdbwoPkEZKBmpSbCiv42bKsCebBtjBhsXB4GWyw05w2SoWq WJAHkz8bo5vrKu0dHPlV+jQvIpc4yXABtD1s8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:50:00 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-llseek tree with the wireless tree From: Tomoki Sekiyama To: Arnd Bergmann , gregkh@suse.de Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "John W. Linville" , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau , Linus , Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1939 Lines: 50 Hi Arnd, On 2010-10-23 09:27:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 23 October 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi John, Dave, >> >> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:35:43 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> >>> Today's linux-next merge of the bkl-llseek tree got a conflict in >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/debug.c between commit >>> 772d5515635fef5bc7a9d0efee785b58b0181ee5 ("ath9k: make rate control >>> debugfs stats per station") from the wireless tree and commit >>> 6038f373a3dc1f1c26496e60b6c40b164716f07e ("llseek: automatically >>> add .llseek fop") from the bkl-llseek tree. >> This patch (reproduced below) will now be needed if the wireless or net >> tree is merged with Linus' tree. I also think I have missed a similar >> needed fix in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/debug.c ... > > There are also new drivers for speakup, intel_sst and yurex that introduce > additional file_operations in next, the patch below is what I had planned > to submit once everything is in. I also expect the occasional driver that > did not see linux-next, so I'll rerun my scripts after -rc1 to see what > we got. Is your patch that adds .llseek fops planned to be merged to -rc? The driver for yurex needs your patch that adds .llseek fop (the hunk below) to work correctly. (tested in 2.6.36-rc2) diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/yurex.c b/drivers/usb/misc/yurex.c index 719c618..ac5bfd6 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/misc/yurex.c +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/yurex.c @@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ static const struct file_operations yurex_fops = { .open = yurex_open, .release = yurex_release, .fasync = yurex_fasync, + .llseek = default_llseek, }; Thanks, -- Tomoki Sekiyama -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/