Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:14:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:14:39 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:42176 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:14:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 20:10:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020610.201033.66168406.davem@redhat.com> To: wjhun@ayrnetworks.com Cc: paulus@samba.org, roland@topspin.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020610110740.B30336@ayrnetworks.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Wait a second, forget all of this cache alignment crap. If we can avoid drivers seeing it, we should by all means necessary. We should just tell people to use PCI pools and be done with it. That way all the complexity about buffer alignment and all this other crapola lives strictly inside of the PCI pool code. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/