Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 05:29:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 05:29:05 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:11023 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 05:29:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:28:59 +0100 From: Russell King To: Martin Dalecki Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19 Message-ID: <20020611102859.F1346@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <3D048CFD.2090201@evision-ventures.com> <20020611004000.GH5202@kroah.com> <3D0599AE.7080809@evision-ventures.com> <20020611092637.C1346@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <3D05B61F.4010609@evision-ventures.com> <20020611100634.D1346@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <3D05BE5B.1000705@evision-ventures.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote: > U?ytkownik Russell King napisa?: > > GCC 3.x introduces the dodgy practice of removing the frame pointer > > from every function despite telling the compiler not to with > > -fno-omit-frame-pointer. It's also contary to the GCC documentation > > when it interferes with debugging. > > This can not be true - since otherwise task switching wouldn't work > at all! It is indeed true. From your comment, it looks like you don't understand the ARM architecture/what a frame pointer is. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/