Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:18:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:18:06 -0400 Received: from denise.shiny.it ([194.20.232.1]:430 "EHLO denise.shiny.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:18:06 -0400 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3D05AA6E.mailKB1BHA1W@viadomus.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:17:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Giuliano Pochini To: DervishD Subject: RE: bandwidth 'depredation' Cc: Linux-kernel Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11-Jun-2002 DervishD wrote: > Hello all :)) > > I've noticed that, when using certain programs like 'wget', the > bandwidth seems to be 'depredated' by them. When I download a file > with lukemftp or with links, the bandwidth is then distributed > between all IP clients, but when using wget or some ftp clients, it > is not distributed. BTW, I'm using an ADSL line (128 up / 256 down). > > IMHO, the IP layer (well, in this case the TCP layer) should > distribute the bandwidth (although I don't know how to do this), and > the kernel seems to be not doing it. No, IP doesn't balance anything. You have to filter the traffic with QoS of traffic shapers to give different "priorities" to packets as you like. Wget doesn't "grab" the bandwidth, it's the remote server that fills it. Bye. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/