Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S131387AbQLLAsc>; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:48:32 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S131412AbQLLAsW>; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:48:22 -0500
Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:41233 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S131387AbQLLAsQ>; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:48:16 -0500
Subject: Re: Enviromental Monitoring
To: paul@clubi.ie (Paul Jakma)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 00:20:03 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), mhaque@haque.net (Mohammad A. Haque),
        andrews@stusoft.com (Andrew Stubbs),
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012120009520.20500-100000@fogarty.jakma.org> from "Paul Jakma" at Dec 12, 2000 12:16:06 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E145dAr-0000On-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> it is? i don't see the sensors stuff, so you must mean just the i2c
> bits. Any word on whether we'll see sensors code go in to 2.4?

The i2c bits

> like i said, their code has worked well for me, but they seem intent
> on keeping it as obscure as possible... (i remember someone posted to

No idea on the sensors stuff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/