Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752908Ab0KWJon (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:44:43 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:38576 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752461Ab0KWJom (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:44:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1290501502.2390.7029.camel@nimitz> References: <20101122161158.02699d10.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1290501502.2390.7029.camel@nimitz> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:44:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Sudden and massive page cache eviction From: =?UTF-8?Q?Peter_Sch=C3=BCller?= To: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mattias de Zalenski , linux-mm@kvack.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 872 Lines: 21 > You don't have anybody messing with /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches, do you? Highly unlikely given that (1) evictions, while often very significant, are usually not *complete* (although the first graph example I provided had a more or less complete eviction) and (2) the evictions are not obviously periodic indicating some kind of cron job, and (3) we see the evictions happening across a wide variety of machines. So yes, I feel confident that we are not accidentally doing that. (FWIW though, drop_caches is great. I only recently found out about it, and it's really useful when benchmarking.) -- / Peter Schuller aka scode -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/