Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751739Ab0KXFQo (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:16:44 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:50271 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751451Ab0KXFQn (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:16:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:16:32 +1100 From: Neil Brown To: Joe Perches Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Linus Torvalds , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: Fix single printks with multiple KERN_s Message-ID: <20101124161632.27a05405@notabene.brown> In-Reply-To: <1290560260.11971.5.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <20101011152516.GF27153@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1290505382-16110-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20101123101210.GA18170@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20101123103940.GN4693@pengutronix.de> <20101123105830.GO4693@pengutronix.de> <20101123223344.GE26510@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1290560260.11971.5.camel@Joe-Laptop> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3736 Lines: 91 On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:57:40 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > Noticed-by: Russell King > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches Applied by: NeilBrown Thanks a lot! NeilBrown > --- > > Note that KERN_foo in the middle of strings, even after a newline are > > preserved in the output. So: > > > > printk(KERN_WARNING "BUG: Your driver calls ioremap() on system memory. This leads\n" > > KERN_WARNING "to architecturally unpredictable behaviour on ARMv6+, and ioremap()\n" > > KERN_WARNING "will fail in the next kernel release. Please fix your driver.\n"); > > > > results in <4>'s appearing on the console. I've always written code > > over the last 15 years assuming that after any newline in printk output, > > the log level gets reset and so needs a new log level specifier. > > > > Sounds like this is something which needs auditing as a result of your > > change, and sounds like its something that kernelnewbies people could > > do. My own greps haven't revealed any cases though. > > drivers/md/raid1.c | 5 +++-- > drivers/md/raid10.c | 5 +++-- > drivers/md/raid5.c | 1 - > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c > index 45f8324..e05381b 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c > @@ -1027,8 +1027,9 @@ static void error(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev) > } else > set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags); > set_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS, &mddev->flags); > - printk(KERN_ALERT "md/raid1:%s: Disk failure on %s, disabling device.\n" > - KERN_ALERT "md/raid1:%s: Operation continuing on %d devices.\n", > + printk(KERN_ALERT > + "md/raid1:%s: Disk failure on %s, disabling device.\n" > + "md/raid1:%s: Operation continuing on %d devices.\n", > mdname(mddev), bdevname(rdev->bdev, b), > mdname(mddev), conf->raid_disks - mddev->degraded); > } > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c > index c67aa54..686543d 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c > @@ -1051,8 +1051,9 @@ static void error(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev) > } > set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags); > set_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS, &mddev->flags); > - printk(KERN_ALERT "md/raid10:%s: Disk failure on %s, disabling device.\n" > - KERN_ALERT "md/raid10:%s: Operation continuing on %d devices.\n", > + printk(KERN_ALERT > + "md/raid10:%s: Disk failure on %s, disabling device.\n" > + "md/raid10:%s: Operation continuing on %d devices.\n", > mdname(mddev), bdevname(rdev->bdev, b), > mdname(mddev), conf->raid_disks - mddev->degraded); > } > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c > index dc574f3..316fbe7 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c > @@ -1721,7 +1721,6 @@ static void error(mddev_t *mddev, mdk_rdev_t *rdev) > set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags); > printk(KERN_ALERT > "md/raid:%s: Disk failure on %s, disabling device.\n" > - KERN_ALERT > "md/raid:%s: Operation continuing on %d devices.\n", > mdname(mddev), > bdevname(rdev->bdev, b), > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/