Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:21:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:21:34 -0400 Received: from ivimey.org ([194.106.52.201]:17191 "EHLO gatemaster.ivimey.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:21:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:21:18 +0100 (BST) From: Ruth Ivimey-Cook X-X-Sender: ruthc@sharra.ivimey.org To: "Randy.Dunlap" cc: Robert Love , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_NR_CPUS, redux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Randy.Dunlap wrote: >On 11 Jun 2002, Robert Love wrote: > >| Here are the defaults I picked: >| >| CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32: i386, mips, parisc, ppc, sparc > >I don't know what is "typical" for non-x86, but for x86, why not >use something more like a 'typical' NR_CPUS for SMP, like 8 (?)... >why still waste all of that memory? Perhaps it's just because I'm coming in late, but I cannot understand why NR_CPUS cannot be as low as 4 by default, for all archs, and then in the kernel boot messages, should more be found than is configured for a message is emitted to say "reconfigure your kernel", and continue with the number it was configured for. I personally only rarely see 2-way boxes, 4-way is pretty rare, and anything more must surely count as very specialized. Let the defaults be reasonable for 99% of users (IMO 99.9%), and let the rest have to think about config options... Ruth -- Ruth Ivimey-Cook Software engineer and technical writer. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/