Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755430Ab0KXQ0A (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:26:00 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:41890 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755473Ab0KXQZw (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:25:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:25:48 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Andi Kleen , Vegard Nossum , David Miller , LKML , Andrew Morton , Eugene Teo , netdev Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_unix: limit unix_tot_inflight Message-ID: <20101124162548.GA7395@basil.fritz.box> References: <1290553918.2866.80.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1290590335.3464.24.camel@edumazet-laptop> <877hg2g4re.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <1290611906.3464.66.camel@edumazet-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1290611906.3464.66.camel@edumazet-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 600 Lines: 19 > I knew somebody would suggest this ;) > > Hmm, why bother ? > > Do you think 16000 is too big ? Too small ? I just don't like static limits. Traditionally even the ones that seemed reasonable at some point were hit by someone years later. The latency issue you mention is a valid concern. I guess an incremental GC would be overkill here ... -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/