Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752230Ab0KYJly (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:41:54 -0500 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:43246 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752208Ab0KYJlw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:41:52 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sRLUf6kEHDw7b4AsezeEeGTzwsz1EUW5DPtAKoJpzp37lgDgqzkMl9zelbQ16Z0taD NCkJuDuerE5sNszKJ9WyYihie/4oQEzReTsbC1F/1yxBJ51NMI3iJwXRYthZDyHtv4fp LyvtAcXU49NpVKMrWQtrxx/Rw36/KnbR94cPI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:41:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13] ACPI / PM: Rework power resources management From: Sedat Dilek To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2183 Lines: 56 On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > I applied your patch-set against linux-next (next-20101124) with > backlight-type patches from Matthew. > > # grep "error:" build_linux-next_next20101124.dileks.2.log > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c:692: > error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_bus_get_power’ > > Looking into the source: > > # grep acpi_bus_get_power -r > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/platform/x86/ > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c: >   result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu->acpi_handle, &state); > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c: >   result = acpi_bus_get_power(fujitsu_hotkey->acpi_handle, &state); > > Checking the acpi tree: > > # grep "acpi_bus_get_power(" -r > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/acpi/ > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/acpi/bus.c:static > int __acpi_bus_get_power(struct acpi_device *device, int *state) > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/acpi/bus.c: >      result = __acpi_bus_get_power(device, &state); > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc3/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/acpi/bus.c: >      result = __acpi_bus_get_power(device, &state); > > Just wanna let you know. > > Kind Regards, > - Sedat - > Guess this is conflicting with your patch "12-13-ACPI-PM-Drop-acpi_bus_get_power.patch". - Sedat - P.S.: Note to myself, add the following snippet for testing purposes: [ debian/config/i386/none/config.686 ] ... ## ## file: drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig ## # CONFIG_FUJITSU_LAPTOP is not set - EOT - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/