Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 23:50:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 23:50:48 -0400 Received: from ausmtp01.au.ibm.COM ([202.135.136.97]:13280 "EHLO ausmtp01.au.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 23:50:47 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Gerrit Huizenga Cc: Linus Torvalds , dent@cosy.sbg.ac.at, adilger@clusterfs.com, da-x@gmx.net, patch@luckynet.dynu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 - list.h cleanup In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:54:04 MST." Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:49:00 +1000 Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message you write: > In message , > : Li > nus Torvalds writes: > > > > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > > > > Worst sin is that you can't predeclare typedefs. For many uses (not the > > > list macros of course): > > > struct xx; > > > is sufficient and avoids the #include hell, > > > > True. > > Untrue. Or partially true (yes, you *can* use struct xx;). > > But you can also use: > > typedef foo_t; Huh? In what language? Try it with -Wall to see what you're really doing here, and think about what happens when you put that in one header, and the real typedef in another. Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/