Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752517Ab0KYVKJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:10:09 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.44.51]:60431 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752090Ab0KYVKH (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:10:07 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mhjwrPsrmVHfqdMxILg57ImU/sjtnsMrEQCkGAsg1QHBJb2TyQD1zrg/vNp8Iv2GbM nEclXOGX4FbwqE57hR/A== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20101125182052.GA7413@basil.fritz.box> References: <1290340877.2245.124.camel@localhost> <8e9ff9280b0c4a059bc82b5c4a629897.squirrel@www.firstfloor.org> <1290348259.2245.172.camel@localhost> <1290361473.2153.39.camel@laptop> <1290644675.2405.90.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> <1290665350.2072.521.camel@laptop> <20101125182052.GA7413@basil.fritz.box> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:10:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v2] perf: Implement Nehalem uncore pmu From: Stephane Eranian To: Andi Kleen Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Lin Ming , Ingo Molnar , lkml , Frederic Weisbecker , Arjan van de Ven Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 958 Lines: 24 On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> Yep, I see no reason to dis-allow sampling. Sure its hard to make sense >> of it, but since there are people who offline all but one cpu of a >> package, > > Assuming they don't have any active PCI devices either. > Good point. >> I bet there are people who will run just one task on a package >> as well. > > In that case the sampling has a 1/NUM-CPU-THREADS-IN-PACKAGE chance > to report the right task (or actually somewhat less because the measurement > skew for uncore is much higher than for normal events) > > Really for per core measurements using the OFFCORE events is much better. > yes, OFFCORE_RESPONSE is much more useful. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/