Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 02:33:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 02:33:04 -0400 Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]:50188 "EHLO netcore.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 02:33:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 09:32:58 +0300 (EEST) From: Pekka Savola To: Ben Greear cc: Mark Mielke , , Subject: Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets In-Reply-To: <3D06E9A0.5060801@candelatech.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Ben Greear wrote: > If they are useful to some people, and have zero performance affect on others > (due to being a configurable kernel feature), then what is your > complaint? 3) Added features and complexity makes it more difficult to maintain the kernel (you could say this is a variant of 1) 4) Patches that have only a little debugging/etc. value are probably useful, but mainly for a specific set of people, and this would seem to be best handled by external patches. > 1) General increase in #ifdef'd code. This actually seems like > a pretty good argument, but I haven't seen anyone mention it > specifically. Always implied from maintenance point-of-view. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/