Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753464Ab0KZHjG (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 02:39:06 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:49819 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750860Ab0KZHjE (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 02:39:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:38:34 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Pavel Machek Cc: Kyle Moffett , Marcus Meissner , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, hpa@zytor.com, w@1wt.eu, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: make /proc/kallsyms mode 400 to reduce ease of attacking Message-ID: <20101126073834.GC19589@elte.hu> References: <20101116104600.GA24015@suse.de> <20101118073126.GB32621@elte.hu> <20101123172437.GB8412@ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101123172437.GB8412@ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1372 Lines: 36 * Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > (2) Most of the arguments about introducing "uncertainty" into the > > > hacking process are specious as well. [...] > > > > It is only specious if you ignore the arguments i made in the previous > > discussion. One argument i made was: > > Well, but it has downsides, too. > > If I know school server is vulnerable, I can get admin to fix it... if > I can see dmesg without being root, I can help with problems. I have > done both before... Yeah, restricting information is always a double edged sword - and by locking down we are implicitly assuming that the number of people trying to do harm is larger than the number of people trying to help. It is probably true though - and the damage they can inflict is becoming more and more serious (financially, legally and socially - and, in some cases, physically) with every year of humanity moving their lives to the 'net. So yes, the time has probably come to lock up "potentially harmful" information from the default unprivileged user on Linux - at least from a default kernel policies POV. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/