Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753704Ab0KZIGj (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 03:06:39 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44649 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753397Ab0KZIGi (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 03:06:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:06:24 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christopher Yeoh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org, Brice Goglin , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Cross Memory Attach v2 (resend) Message-ID: <20101126080624.GA26764@elte.hu> References: <20101122122847.3585b447@lilo> <20101122130527.c13c99d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101122130527.c13c99d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1510 Lines: 36 * Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:28:47 +1030 > Christopher Yeoh wrote: > > > Resending just in case the previous mail was missed rather than ignored :-) > > I'd appreciate any comments.... > > Fear, uncertainty, doubt and resistance! > > We have a bit of a track record of adding cool-looking syscalls and > then regretting it a few years later. Few people use them, and maybe > they weren't so cool after all, and we have to maintain them for ever. They are often cut off at the libc level and never get into apps. If we had tools/libc/ (mapped by the kernel automagically via the vDSO), where people could add new syscall usage to actual, existing, real-life libc functions, where the improvements could thus propagate into thousands of apps immediately, without requiring any rebuild of apps or even any touching of the user-space installation, we'd probably have _much_ more lively development in this area. Right now it's slow and painful, and few new syscalls can break through the brick wall of implementation latency, app adoption disinterest due to backwards compatibility limitations and the resulting inevitable lack of testing and lack of tangible utility. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/