Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:26:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:26:51 -0400 Received: from mail.zmailer.org ([62.240.94.4]:52888 "EHLO mail.zmailer.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:26:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:26:45 +0300 From: Matti Aarnio To: Alan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Status of FAT CVF? Message-ID: <20020612112645.A19520@mea-ext.zmailer.org> In-Reply-To: <1023856708.2934.9.camel@summanulla.clueserver.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 09:38:27PM -0700, Alan wrote: > What is the status of fat_cvf in 2.4.x? Is the code abandoned? > Supported? Working? Not working? Pining for the fnords? Over about past week there has been some talk with that topic. The conclusion appeared to be "kernel driver is abandoned, future support belongs into mtools". Thread Subject was something like "fat/msdos/...". Go see the archives. (And having word "fat" in message subject does cause several sites to consider even this message to be spam...) > Thanks! /Matti Aarnio - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/