Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 05:31:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 05:31:00 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:30671 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 05:30:59 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 02:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020612.022641.123609388.davem@redhat.com> To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au Cc: akpm@zip.com.au, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, k-suganuma@mvj.biglobe.ne.jp Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 Nonlinear CPU support From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Rusty Russell Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:58:23 +1000 In message <20020611.021043.04190747.davem@redhat.com> you write: > And remember, it's the anal "every microoptimization at all costs" > people that keep the kernel sane and from running out of control bloat > wise. But it also gave us crap like net/ipv4/route.c:ip_rt_acct_read() 8( That's far from being an attempt optimization :-) Furthermore, cleanup patches are always happily accepted. 9 out of 10 2.5.x networking patches I apply are cleanups from Arnaldo these days. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/