Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 01:37:38 +0100
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Provide pm_runtime_no_callbacks flag in cell
 data
Message-ID: <20101127003737.GB4777@sortiz-mobl>
References: <1290791975-21160-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1290791975-21160-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 806
Lines: 22

Hi Mark,

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> Allow MFD cells to have pm_runtime_no_callbacks() called on them during
> registration. This causes the runtime PM framework to ignore them,
> allowing use of runtime PM to suspend the device as a whole even if
> not all drivers for the MFD can usefully implement runtime PM. For
> example, RTCs are likely to run continuously regardless of the power
> state of the system.
Makes sense, both patches applied.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/